Implant surfaces - advanced level
Video highlights
- Different types of implant topographies (roughness)
- Influence of implant surfaces on bone reaction (Osseointegration)
- Other implant surface factors (chemistry, physics)
In the second part of the webinar series, Prof. Dr. Tomas Albrektsson starts his presentation with the review of the six factors that are important for osseointegration. He continues with discussing the characteristics of modern implant surfaces. Prof. Albrektsson reviews the different types of implant surface roughness in detail, he explains how the roughness is measured and what influence it can have on the surrounding bone. Next, he discusses the surface chemistry, how it can be measures and how it can influence the site the implant is placed in. Prof. Albrektsson then continues with the physics, the surface energy of an implant. Following this, he reviews the nano-roughness of implant surfaces, including the measuring of it and its likely clinical influence. He concludes his presentation with the review of the newest surfaces available for implants and abutments.
After his presentation, Prof. Albrektsson discusses key points of implant surfaces and other influences on implant surfaces, e.g. corrosion or cleanliness, with the moderator of the webinar series, Dr. Nikola Vasilic.
This video is available with captions in different languages - click on the cc button in the lower right corner to select your preferred language.
References
[1] Albrektsson T, Brånemark PI, Hansson HA, Lindström J. Osseointegrated titanium implants. Requirements for ensuring a long-lasting, direct bone-to-implant anchorage in man. Acta Orthop Scand. 1981;52(2):155-70. doi: 10.3109/17453678108991776. PMID: 7246093.
[2] Balshe AA, Eckert SE, Koka S, Assad DA, Weaver AL. The effects of smoking on the survival of smooth- and rough-surface dental implants. Int J Oral Maxillofac Implants. 2008 Nov-Dec;23(6):1117-22. PMID: 19216282.
[3] Ellingsen JE, Johansson CB, Wennerberg A, Holmén A. Improved retention and bone-tolmplant contact with fluoride-modified titanium implants. Int J Oral Maxillofac Implants. 2004 Sep-Oct;19(5):659-66. PMID: 15508981.
[4] Cooper LF, Zhou Y, Takebe J, Guo J, Abron A, Holmén A, Ellingsen JE. Fluoride modification effects on osteoblast behavior and bone formation at TiO2 grit-blasted c.p. titanium endosseous implants. Biomaterials. 2006 Feb;27(6):926-36. doi: 10.1016/j.biomaterials.2005.07.009. Epub 2005 Aug 19. PMID: 16112191.
[5] Orsini G, Piattelli M, Scarano A, Petrone G, Kenealy J, Piattelli A, Caputi S. Randomized, controlled histologic and histomorphometric evaluation of implants with nanometer-scale calcium phosphate added to the dual acid-etched surface in the human posterior maxilla. J Periodontol. 2007 Feb;78(2):209-18. doi: 10.1902/jop.2007.060297. PMID: 17274708.
[6] Ostman PO, Wennerberg A, Albrektsson T. Immediate occlusal loading of NanoTite PREVAIL implants: a prospective 1-year clinical and radiographic study. Clin Implant Dent Relat Res. 2010 Mar;12(1):39-47. doi: 10.1111/j.1708-8208.2008.00128.x. PMID: 20148916.
[7] Wennerberg A, Galli S, Albrektsson T. Current knowledge about the hydrophilic and nanostructured SLActive surface. Clin Cosmet Investig Dent. 2011 Sep 5;3:59-67. doi: 10.2147/CCIDEN.S15949. PMID: 23674916; PMCID: PMC3652359.
[8] Meirelles L, Arvidsson A, Albrektsson T, Wennerberg A. Increased bone formation to unstable nano rough titanium implants. Clin Oral Implants Res. 2007 Jun;18(3):326-32. doi: 10.1111/j.1600-0501.2006.01308.x. Epub 2007 Apr 11. PMID: 17425657.
[9] Wennerberg A, Albrektsson T. On implant surfaces: a review of current knowledge and opinions. Int J Oral Maxillofac Implants. 2010 Jan-Feb;25(1):63-74. PMID: 20209188.
[10] Wennerberg A, Albrektsson T, Chrcanovic B. Long-term clinical outcome of implants with different surface modifications. Eur J Oral Implantol. 2018;11 Suppl 1:S123-S136. PMID: 30109304.
[11] Hall J, Neilands J, Davies JR, Ekestubbe A, Friberg B. A randomized, controlled, clinical study on a new titanium oxide abutment surface for improved healing and soft tissue health. Clin Implant Dent Relat Res. 2019 Mar;21 Suppl 1:55-68. doi: 10.1111/cid.12749. Epub 2019 Mar 12. PMID: 30859691.
[12] Milleret V, Lienemann PS, Bauer S, Ehrbar M. Quantitative in vitro comparison of the thrombogenicity of commercial dental implants. Clin Implant Dent Relat Res. 2019 Mar;21 Suppl 1:8-14. doi: 10.1111/cid.12737. Epub 2019 Feb 28. PMID: 30816636.
[13] Fabbri G, Staas T, Linkevicius T, Valantiejiene V, González-Martin O, Rompen E. Clinical Performance of a Novel Two-Piece Abutment Concept: Results from a Prospective Study with a 1-Year Follow-Up. J Clin Med. 2021 Apr 9;10(8):1594. doi: 10.3390/jcm10081594. PMID: 33918898; PMCID: PMC8070442.
