-
0
Introduction
00:00 - 04:34
-
1
Implant protocol to rehabilitate extracted teeth due to carious lesion: some clinical cases
04:34 - 08:00
-
2
Delayed implant protocol on periodontal patients
08:00 - 10:58
-
3
Treatment protocol in fractured teeth
10:58 - 15:33
-
4
Conclusions
15:33 - 16:13
- 5 Community questions
Maxim Kopylov: Immediate vs delayed protocols. A decision tree.
Video highlights
- Immediate vs. delayed implant placement
- Decision-making tree
- Nobel Biocare New York Symposium 2016
- Master posterior solutions with a team approach general session
Today, the time factor plays an increasingly important role in a patient’s treatment decisions and effective solutions are expected from the dentist. This raises issues when deciding on immediate or delayed implant placement even in the posterior zone. Several factors need to be taken into consideration when deciding between the different methods.
A protocol of decision making of the two treatment modalities will be illustrated by several clinical cases. This decision tree is influenced by the bone quality and quantity at the implant placement site, the presence of infections, the occlusal forces and the number of implants placed. By using a decision tree you can simplify your choice between immediate or delayed implant placement.
Dr. Kopylov graduated from Samara State Medical University, Russia, in 2004. Following this he specialized in oral and maxillofacial surgery. Dr. Kopylov is a surgeon at several leading clinics in Moscow. He specializes in complex bone and soft tissue grafting and implant treatment with immediate loading including zygomatic implants. He is a regular participant at professional events on both a regional and international level. Dr. Kopylov is the author of several scientific publications and coauthor of five patents. He is an affiliate of the European Academy of Esthetic Dentistry (EAED).