-
0
Introduction
00:00 - 04:14
-
1
Single-unit rehabilitation: what can be achieved?
04:14 - 06:35
-
2
Treatment options for the posterior maxilla
06:35 - 14:10
-
3
Managing the implant proximity to the lower alveolar nerve
14:10 - 17:41
-
4
Surgical circumstances when treating completely edentulous patients
17:41 - 23:50
- 5 Community questions
Bertil Friberg: Achieving surgical success for compromised bone - graft or not graft
Video highlights
- Review of the experiences with grafting and implants in the field of grafting procedures since 1980
- With introduction of the TiUnite surface, early failure rates went considerably down
- Consider anatomical location and condition of mandibuar nerve, e.g. occasional anterior loop
- Treatment with short implants is faster, cheaper and associated with less morbidity in comparison to bone augmentation protocols
- Modern surgical armamentarium like piezo surgery devices assist in lower invasive and safer techniques
- Tokyo 2014 symposium presentation
Implant treatment in compromised bone situations can be managed with different techniques, with and without grafting protocols. Supported by broad literature and meta-analysis data, Dr Friberg reviews experiences with grafting and implants in the field of grafting procedures since 1980, and graftless solutions with today's implant designs. In the early days failure rates were higher than today, after the year 2000, with the TiUnite surface, early failure rates went considerably down. Treatment options in the posterior maxilla comprise inlay grafts, onlay grafts, use of short, tilted and zygomatic implants, and the use of tooth-connected implants. Avoiding rotating instruments, piezo surgery devices assist in lower invasive and safer techniques. In the mandible, Dr Friberg emphasizes to take the anatomic location of the alveolar nerve into account, especially in the absorbed mandible, and in situations with an anterior loop of the nerve, the proximity of the nerve to implant sites has to be considered. Mandibular nerve transpositions have been abandonned today. Treatment with short implants is faster, cheaper and associated with less morbidity in comparison to bone augmentation protocols. The mandibular arch can be functionally strengthened by physiological loading with implant based treatment.
Questions
Ask a question
Log in or sign up to continue
You have reached the limit of content accessible without log in or this content requires log in. Log in or sign up now to get unlimited access to all FOR online resources.
No payments necessary - FOR is completely free of charge.